Puppies Crush Crime by Howard Bloom

The results are in.  Neighborhoods where people walk their dogs have half the rate of murder. Why?

We already knew that having a dog decreases your stress level, lowers your blood pressure^[i]and increases your life span.  Now we have a study showing that a neighborhood where people have dogs and walk them is safer than a neighborhood that goes without dogs. 

In 1961, the highly influential social theorist and author Jane Jacobs proposed that neighborhoods where people trust each other and watch out for each other have less crime than neighborhoods where people don’t.  But in the sixty years since then, it’s been hard to back that speculation up.  Why?  It’s been hard to find a measure of neighborhood trust and watchfulness. 

Now researchers at Ohio State University think they have found a way to do it.  They guessed that neighborhoods where people have dogs and walk them have what they call “paws on the street.”

Or as the study’s lead author, Nicolo Pinchak of Ohio State’s Institute for Population Research, puts it, “People walking their dogs are essentially patrolling their neighborhoods, They see when things are not right, and when there are suspect outsiders in the area.”  

And people stop to fuss over each other’s dogs. They get to know each other. 

Pinchak says. “When people are out walking their dogs, they have conversations, they pet each other’s dogs. Sometimes they know the dog’s name and not even the owners.”  

In other words, dog walking knits together the social fabric of a neighborhood.  

But does any of this stop crime?  The answer is yes.  A very  big yes. 

The Ohio State University researchers reviewed data from 43,078 residents of Columbus, Ohio, in 595 census blocks to see if neighborhoods with dogs have lower crime rates than neighborhoods without dogs.  The results?  

As writer Chris Melore sums it up, ”trusting neighborhoods with more dogs cut their robbery rate by a third and cut their homicide rate in half.”

Five years earlier, a 2017 study of parcels of land with licensed dogs in Milwaukee had already showed slightly lower rates of property crime.  Very slightly.  

But the new study indicates that it’s not the dogs barking at intruders that makes the biggest difference.  It’s the trust between neighbors.  Yes, dogs barking in a house can ward off a burglar.  But the big difference in crime is  what the Ohio State University study’s authors in the very title of their journal article call those “paws on the street.”  And the people on the other end of the leash.  

Or, to put it differently, a dog-walking neighborhood has what writer Chris Melore  calls “more eyes on the street.”  More than that.  Dog walking creates social ties.  Dog-walking turns neighbors into a team, a family. So a dog-walking neighborhood is more crime resistant than a neighborhood where people simply let their dogs loose in the back yard or have no dogs at all.  

Then there are the side benefits of dogs.  Petting a dog lowers your levels of the stress hormone cortisol.  Cuddling a dog increases your level of the hormone of love and trust—oxytocin.  Owning a dog even lowers your level of triglycerides and cholesterol and guards the health of your heart. And, to repeat, owning a dog increases your life span. 

The health benefits of having a pet are so substantial that Tufts  University has an entire lab on its Medford, Massachusetts, campus dedicated to Pets and Well-Being.  

But most important is the way that walking your dog knits you together with your neighbors^[ii]and makes your block or your neighborhood crime resistant. As Ohio State University writer Jeff Grabmeier suggests, “If you want to find a safe neighborhood to live in, choose one where the residents trust each other — and have a lot of dogs to walk.”

References:

Nicolo P Pinchak, Christopher R Browning, Bethany Boettner, Catherine A Calder, Jake Tarrence, Paws on the Street: Neighborhood-Level Concentration of Households with Dogs and Urban Crime, Social Forces, 2022;, soac059, https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soac059

Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect June McNicholas, Glyn M. Collis, British Journal of Psychology, 24 December 2010 https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161673

Chris Melore, Neighborhoods with more dogs see less crime, study shows, July 5, 2022,  https://www.studyfinds.org/more-dogs-less-crime/

https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-bond-for-life-pets/pets-as-coworkers/pets-and-mental-health

______

Howard Bloom has been called the Einstein, Newton, and Freud of the 21st century by Britain’s Channel 4 TV.  One of his seven books–Global Brain—was the subject of a symposium thrown by the Office of the Secretary of Defense including representatives from the State Department, the Energy Department, DARPA, IBM, and MIT.  His work has been published in The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, Wired, Psychology Today, and the Scientific American.  He does news commentary at 1:06 am et every Wednesday night on 545 radio stations on Coast to Coast AM.  For more, see http://howardbloom.institute

^[i] https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-bond-for-life-pets/pets-as-coworkers/pets-and-mental-health

^[ii] Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect June McNicholas,Glyn M. Collis First published: 24 December 2010 https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161673